“Mr. Attorney General, we will hold illegal border crossers as you wish, but we will NOT separate minor children from their parents!”
Most of us are shocked by our nation’s recent decision to separate children from their parents who are illegally entering the United States. As I understand it, prior to the present decision, illegal immigrants and their children remained together and the adults were given a court date which required their appearance at a future date. Illegal immigration was not a felony crime. Now one can argue about whether this is good or bad public policy, but, that’s the way it was.
Now comes our U.S. Attorney General who wants to get tough on immigration. He uses Christian scriptures (Romans 13), that Christians should obey the laws of civil government, to justify his toughness. (Deftly avoiding the issue of just versus unjust laws).
So now the border police are told to consider illegal border crossings to be felony offenses — and how (in past practice) do police handle felons? Well, they separate them from their children, put the adults in jail, and call child welfare authorities to take the children into protective custody.
Is this the most ethical way to respond? Now here’s why we need smart, moral cops: they need to think about our values as a nation. While it has been past practice to separate felonious parents from their children, is this the best way to respond today to this problem? Can exceptions be made; that is can we create a new way to handle those in our country illegally without separating adults from their children? (I understand babies are NOT being separated, but children around 4 or 5 years of age and older are.)
Can border patrol leaders stand up and say, “Mr. Attorney General, we will hold illegal border crossers as you wish, but we will NOT separate minor children from their parents!”
That’s what I would expect a police leader to say and do. Of course, I would suggest this, at first, is not done publicly, but as a series of negotiations with federal prosecutors.
This is not too much to ask or expect from police in a democratic society.
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..
LikeLiked by 1 person
now we have “baby jails”…. some of the people in criminal justice programs were also in my psychology classes. one student wrote on the final exam: “It is all Tsongas’ fault that we have so many Cambodians in here”…. I went to the department chair but being only adjunct faculty, there was not much I could do to take on Godzilla… What are we teaching when they take up these programs? ATF, ICE, etc.
I heard of a similar experience. The mission of the CJ Dept was not reflected in the students they were graduating. More on this later.
Jean, A very good question. How are we educating future police in our academic institutions? One I know of states their mission to be 1. liberally educated, 2. intellectually mature, 3. ethically aware, and 4. culturally sensitive. Many who teach future police do not see these values active in many of their students. Mission NOT accomplished!
LikeLiked by 1 person