Casuistry: Seeing the Particular in Both Sides

Malcolm Gladwell presents a most interesting podcast about “descending into the particular” — Casuistry* (see below). Which is to value the ability to weigh equally both sides of an argument or investigation.

Those of us in leadership positions have had to do this fairly regularly when deciding personnel matters and meting out discipline.

Both what about an officer-involved death of a citizen. Can we really look at the event without a pre-existing bias?

Gladwell attempts to do this with an actual police shooting —,trying to “descend into the particular.”

Listen to it HERE and tell me what you think.

____________________________________

*“Casuistry is the ‘study of cases of conscience and a method of solving conflicts of obligations by applying general principles of ethics, religion, and moral theology to particular and concrete cases of human conduct. This frequently demands an extensive knowledge of natural law and equity, civil law, ecclesiastical precepts, and an exceptional skill in interpreting these various norms of conduct.’ It remains a common tool for applied ethics” – Wikipedia.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.