The following letter describes what I had hoped and worked for the the late 1960’s.
We had a small movement going among some police officers in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area.
Everyday, we were dealing with civil rights issues and anti-war protests.
A number of us knew there was a better way forward and we found it.
Are those voices out there today?
(After the following letter was published, I was called into the office of the chief of police and among other commanders present, told that I was in trouble for writing this without department permission and that I would be disciplined.
My professors at the University of Minnesota came to my defense and the charges never materialized.
My colleagues and I pressed on.)
Letter to the editor
Minneapolis Tribune
January 1, 1968
There has been much discussion of the presentation of police-Negro community relations on the Public Broadcasting Laboratory of KTCA_TV, channel 2, on Dec. 17.
The program was designed to explore police-Negro relationships in a number of major American cities. However, the program more clearly illustrated the sociological process called ‘polarization,’ in which two major opposing factions in society draw and split into two separate camps.
The danger lies in that there remains no choice of a neutral middle ground for a person to objectively explore the situation. Everyone is forced to make a choice, either ‘them’ or ‘us.’ This impending polarization of our society is a threatening sign and indicative of the many complex social problems we have. They can be considered warning signs to a democratic government.
Within this entanglement of social problems stand the nation’s police. However, the men who represent law enforcement that Sunday were, as a group, much to be desired and were not representative of today’s young, professional police officer. It is this police officer who will be making the important command decisions in the very near future.
Those of us who consider ourselves as professional law enforcement officers are very disturbed by the impending polarization of society. We recognize our role as representatives of government, but we also realize we have a duty to represent the Constitution of the United States. We recognize our fundamental duty is to serve mankind as set forth in our code of ethics.
We recognized and understand the Negro’s struggle through history, his emergence today, and his longtime distrust of the police. We suggest that police officers and Negroes might change their attitudes by first changing their behavior towards one another. We are all slaves of our ignorance and prejudices, but racism, prejudicial attitudes, or even stereotypes have no place in any American community.
Today’s police hope that the Negro community realizes that the police are professionalizing, particularly through college and technical training programs. We realize that education is the key to our advancement. We have not been the cause of poverty, housing segregation, educational problems, or occupational difficulties that has plagued the Negro. However, we professional police officers can pledge equal, fair law enforcement regardless of a man’s race, color, or creed. May this be a public pledge of good law enforcement to our community, Minneapolis.
David C. Couper
President, Local Chapter, Lambda Alpha Epsilon
(A National Fraternity of Law Enforcement Professionals)
Improving Police: A Necessary Conversation 
Don’t see anything wrong with that letter. It’s well written.
Tribalism: polarization is certainly on the increase and there doesn’t seem to be a place today from the head down for common sense in any of this anymore.
My view is this; if a person wants to win at any cost by labelling even to the point of lying and/or deceiving to get his/her way there is no way over time that it will really help to benefit anyone but there agenda and hurting people.
Fixes: We need to find ways to help people out of there self made man made issues/prisons and not push them into it further.
I read a book years ago called: Education begins before birth that I found fascinating.
The author reveals that the child knows at some point what is happening outside and is being programmed by the environment and the feeling of the woman during her pregnancy. He says that if you will take a pregnant woman out of a bad environment and place her into a good one till she has the child that you can actually change the destiny of the child after it’s born. He will then grow up and be different in an environment opposite because of his new nature. There might be some truth to that but personally I don’t know….
LikeLike